The McNealy Contrast
The Limits of Elite Putting: Maverick McNealy
While Scottie Scheffler proved that a golfer can dominate the PGA Tour with median-level putting, Maverick McNealy represents the opposite side of the spectrum. McNealy has consistently ranked as one of the tour’s premier putters, regularly outperforming the field average on the greens. Yet despite his putting brilliance, McNealy has not matched Scheffler-style dominance in the Official World Golf Ranking or tournament victories.
Why Great Putting Isn’t Enough
Across 2020–2023, McNealy posted a career median of 28.0 putts per round, consistently beating the tour median (28.75) and averaging nearly a full putt per round better than Scheffler (~29.0). In 2023, his average dipped to an extraordinary 27.7 putts per round.
However, comparing their overall tour impact highlights why putting alone cannot create a world number one:
- Tour Rankings vs. Scheffler: While Scheffler captured multiple major championships, FedExCup titles, and established an insurmountable lead as World No. 1, McNealy has generally hovered between 50th and 100th in the Official World Golf Ranking (OWGR) and FedExCup standings.
- The Ball-Striking Deficit: Modern golf analytics shows that Strokes Gained: Tee-to-Green accounts for roughly two-thirds of scoring variance on tour. While Scheffler leads the tour in Greens in Regulation (GIR) at over 73%, McNealy has historically ranked near the tour median in greens hit and iron play.
- The Scrambler’s Effect: McNealy’s low putts-per-round figure is partially driven by necessity: missing greens forces him to chip from around the green and make clutch one-putts to save par. In contrast, Scheffler hits greens from distance, facing longer initial birdie putts that naturally yield two-putts.
In short, elite putting provides a high scramble floor, but without Scheffler’s generational ball-striking, putting alone cannot produce sustained PGA Tour dominance.